Excessive polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in 147 care homes: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Care home residents often have multiple cognitive and physical impairments, and are at high risk of adverse drug events (ADEs). AIM: To describe excessive polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing predisposing care home residents to ADEs. DESIGN & SETTING: A cross-sectional analysis of all dispensed prescriptions for 147 care home residents in Tayside and Fife, Scotland. METHOD: Prevalence of excessive polypharmacy was examined using multilevel logistic regression, by modelling associations between individual and care home predictors with excessive polypharmacy (≥10 drugs). Prescribing of drugs known to increase the risk of eight clinically important ADE categories was examined. Drugs prescribed within each ADE category, for each resident, were counted. RESULTS: In total, 32.3% (n = 1444/4468) of residents had excessive polypharmacy, which was more common in residents aged 70-74 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04 to 3.34) and 80-84 years (aOR 1.75, 95% CI = 1.01 to 3.02), living in a residential care home (aOR 1.50, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.88), and located in Fife (aOR 1.37, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.71). Excessive polypharmacy was less common in residents with dementia (aOR 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.84), and 8.9% (95% CI = 5.9% to 11.6%) of the variation was attributable to care home predictors. Potentially inappropriate prescribing of ≥2 drugs was seen across all ADE categories, with highest prevalence seen in drugs predisposing to constipation (35.8%), sedation (27.7%), and renal injury (18.0%). CONCLUSION: Excessive polypharmacy is common in care home residents and is associated with both individual and care home predictors. Potentially inappropriate prescribing of drugs that predisposed residents to all included ADE categories is common. Research is needed to support and evaluate safe care home prescribing practices.

The burden of psychotropic and anticholinergic medicines use in care homes: population-based analysis in 147 care homes.

BACKGROUND: older people living in care-homes are particularly vulnerable to adverse effects of psychotropic and anticholinergic drugs. METHODS: anonymised dispensed prescription data from all 4,478 residents aged ≥ 60 years in 147 care-homes in two Scottish health boards were analysed. Psychotropic medicines examined were antipsychotics, antidepressants, hypnotic/anxiolytics, opioids and gabapentinoids. Anticholinergic burden was measured using the modified anticholinergic risk scale (mARS). Variation between care-homes and associations with individual and care-home characteristics were examined using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: 63.5% of residents were prescribed at least one psychotropic drug, and 27.0% two or more, most commonly antidepressants (41.6%), opioids (20.3%), hypnotic/anxiolytics (16.9%) and antipsychotics (16.7%). 48.1% were prescribed an anticholinergic drug, and 12.1% had high anticholinergic burden (mARS ≥ 3). Variation between care-homes was high for antipsychotics (intra-cluster correlation coefficient [ICC] 8.2%) and hypnotics/anxiolytics (ICC = 7.3%), and moderate for antidepressants (ICC = 4.7%) and anticholinergics (ICC = 2.8%). Prescribing of all drugs was lower in the oldest old. People with dementia were more likely to be prescribed antipsychotics (adjusted OR = 1.45, 95%CI 1.23-1.71) but less likely to be prescribed anticholinergics (aOR = 0.61, 95%CI 0.51-0.74). Prescribing of antipsychotics was higher in Tayside (aOR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.20-1.92), whereas prescribing of antidepressants (particularly tricyclic-related) was lower (aOR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.56-0.79). There was no association with care-home regulator quality scores. CONCLUSION: care-home residents have high psychotropic and anticholinergic burden, with considerable variation between care-homes that is not related to existing measures of quality of care. Research to better understand variation between care-homes and the interaction with local prescribing cultures is needed.

Inusual causa de deterioro progresivo de la función renal / Uncommon cause of progressive renal function decline

Toda vez que a lo largo de 3 meses hay una caída del 50% del filtrado glomerular estamos en presencia de lo que se define como deterioro rápidamente evolutivo de la función renal. Si además es acompañado de un sedimento urinario activo, inferimos estar frente a una glomerulopatía rápidamente evolutiva, una microangiopatía trombótica, una enfermedad renal ateroembólica o una nefritis intersticial. La mayoría de las veces la celeridad con que se inicia el tratamiento impacta en el resultado del mismo, lo que con frecuencia obliga a realizarlo en forma empírica. No obstante, como la terapéutica a emplear no es inocua, debemos extremar las medidas diagnósticas para definir la etiología, este caso es un ejemplo de ello

Whenever there is a 50% drop in glomerular filtration over 3 months we are in the presence of what is defined as rapidly progressive deterioration of renal function. If it is also accompanied by an active urinary sediment, it is inferred that one of these may be taking place: a rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, a thrombotic microangiopathy, an atheroembolic renal disease or an interstitial nephritis. In most cases the speed with which the treatment is initiated impacts on its result, which often requires that it is done empirically. However, as the therapy used is not innocuous, we must maximize diagnostic measures to define the etiology; this case is an example of this